Главная страница «Первого сентября»Главная страница журнала «Английский язык»Содержание №37/2003
 
METHODS OF TEACHING

Summary Discussion and Writing

The reading of original and unabridged articles in newspapers and magazines is advantageous as it both gives the precious opportunity to learn new and handy vocabulary, and stimulates a lot of discussion if students are persistently challenged to speak on a topic. The ultimate aim of such work can be a well-developed summary that helps effectively deal with new information and supplies numerous themes for oral tasks that are necessary for producing fluent speakers.

The right choice of articles is important for the students’ ability to cope with them, and it’s evident that the most acceptable will be the most newsworthy stories. These will probably be features about pop and rock bands, performers popular among the students, local news, and anything that will be interesting to the learners. A good thing to start with may be to ask students to choose an article to work on themselves, as it is painful to study a subject that is completely new.

Some words and abbreviations which are crucial for understanding the text need to be written on one half of the blackboard and translated or defined beforehand, leaving detailed translation for home. While scanning the story in order to grasp its general idea, the students are asked to underline or highlight new words, and also make a mark in the margin each time they come across the name of a person, organization, or country – it will later help to find these details for the discussion following. When they are through with this reading exercise, the first speaking task will be to elicit all background information about the source with the focus on validity.

Here we can turn their attention to what is known about the source (newspaper/magazine): a) whether the students know anything about it, or might have heard about it, or read it sometimes, even the grade of the newsprint may be of some use; b) the issue: recent or outdated, if so why it’s still important; c) the author: whether he/she is an editor/columnist, etc., works for some other paper, their nationality/sex and possible prejudices connected with it, and even describing the author’s appearance can be suggested here as a rather fun activity.

It should be noted that the article is to be regarded as a support for the speaking task. That means that the students, while being questioned, should be encouraged to answer while looking up at the teacher rather than reading out of the text.

The result of the discussion will be the very first sentence of the summary, e.g. An article “Freedom of Faith for All” by Lawrence Uzzell, a freelance writer (specializing in religious freedom in the former Soviet Union), appeared in “The Moscow Times” on June 5, 2003.

The reason for the article is another step: it’s important to pay attention to what triggered the writing. This can be done while answering questions like What has happened? Who participated? When and Where? The results or consequences of the occasion also can be discussed and noted. Thus we formulate another line of the summary, giving information about the event that caused the feature.

The next part in this routine is to make a summary of every paragraph in a few words and verify the students can discern between fact, opinion, or the author’s attitude towards the event described. The writer’s view is usually shown in the choice of stylistically coloured words, especially attributes, and is clearly understood from the context. It is not that easy to separate plain facts from opinions, but such analysis is usually not relevant. The home assignment, correspondingly, will be to summarize each paragraph of the article in the same way. Besides, the students may be given the task to write down questions to the sentences with new words, so that the answer should be the word itself. This helps students concentrate on the context of the word.

The words that have been written on the board are for the students to remember, and any game for learning new vocabulary is welcome at this stage. In Memorizing Words (P. Ur & A. Wright) the class is asked to pick one of the new words and to suggest an English word they know which it reminds them of in some way. This ‘reminding word’ should be written on the other side of the board. Having written the ‘reminding word’, the new word is erased. Do this with each of the new words until they have all been replaced by ‘reminding words’. Now ask the students what each ‘reminding word’ was linked to. Write in the new words again and erase the ‘reminding words’. This effective and relaxing activity rounds off the first stage of working on the summary.

Another game of the same type, “Brainstorm round a word”, can be used at the beginning of the next lesson. Give a student a word that has recently been learnt, and ask him/her to suggest all the words associated with it. Write each suggestion on the board with a line joining to the original word, in a circle, so that you should get a ‘sunray’ effect, and elicit the original word from the class. Such exercise is indispensable for the task of teaching students how to explain the meaning of new words; it creates further evocative paths, and also reviews and enriches students’ vocabulary.

The main body of the summary consists of the key points the students have identified while summarizing each paragraph of the article. Any discrepancies in their statements serve as a basis for discussion and reasoning. While doing that, the students speak about the people, places, and countries mentioned in the story. For example, those who have been to the cities/countries can tell something interesting about them or share their experiences. As for organizations, their aims can be noted, as well as their roles and influence. Each time the previously marked names arise for discussion, the students tell what general statements these particular examples support. The context in which they are used or information about them in other parts of the article can also help develop the students, or probe the author’s opinion of the person/organization/event in question.

If we divide the story into much larger parts, it may become evident that some parts of the text are irrelevant. So, in the end, while going through the summary again, it’s advisable to see if there are any statements which go together, or if there are some ways of combining the points into one statement, or the order of statements should be changed.

As a result of this task the students should first visualize and understand the most precise layout of the summary and, second, be able to agree upon the message. The aims of the article can be to inform the reader; to influence his opinion; to convince or persuade him of something; to provide a lingering influence on his mind and feelings; or to entertain. If the students have encountered such kind of writing for the first time, it may be useful to remind them of any special vocabulary: features are special stories or articles; editorials are articles expressing opinion; the detailed examination of an idea or event is analysis; while the feature story of the day or the most newsworthy is the lead story, etc. Whether the author has achieved his aim should be discussed, and some points in what students agree or disagree with regarding the message of the feature.

It may be very useful to make the students learn the summary they’ve done because in this way words and phrases are remembered in the most desirable way, in their context, and within collocation and prepositional patterns. Here also arises the matter of fluency. A native Englishman speakes quickly, pronouncing 220 words per minute on the average, compared with the 180 words of a Russian. So it requires special training for a Russian-speaker to learn to discern such fast speech, and to achieve almost the same speed while speaking. The demands on the fluency of the students depend on the level of the class, but what should be borne in mind is that a radio announcer would present their summary (10–12 long sentences, ~ 220 words) in a minute, not more, and this could be taken as a desirable standard.

The new words that have been learnt may then be arranged in a small crossword using definitions from an English-English dictionary, copied and given to the students to work with on their own, while the rest of the group is engaged in some other activity. Any word games including “jumbled words”, “matching the adjectives”, and the like, serve the same purpose: to make the students revise something related to the topic. The stress on learning new words should be placed according to the aim of studies, as newspaper style differs greatly from what is used in everyday life.

In short, summary making takes five steps:

1. Vocabulary Study
2. Source Identifying
3. Event Defining
4. Paragraph Summarizing
5. Message Discussion

By Olga Mishchenko,
Moscow,
School No. 1304